Technology 15 Jun 2026

Social media ban - bold and blunt, but no silver bullet

The BBC's technology editor Zoe Kleinman on the big changes coming down the line for young people online.

5 min read C1

C1 Version

Click any word for its Thai meaning.

0:00 0:00
When I arrived at 10 Downing Street this morning to hear the prime minister announce the UK's social media ban for under-16s, I had to hand in my phone for security reasons. Sir Keir Starmer's news was bold and blunt: yes there will be a ban, yes it will follow Australia's model and yes, there will be additional curbs which will impact older children, aged 16 and 17, as well. A night-time curfew is expected to be part of this. The UK's plan had been dubbed "Australia Plus" and now we know why. But Australia's ban has faced well-documented problems, not least because the majority of children who had social media accounts before the ban was enforced in December, still have them. The response from the UK government is the same answer I hear every time there's an online safety intervention. There is talk that the ban will not be a "silver bullet" but will still make some difference. Sir Keir made several comparisons to laws about drinking alcohol: we know some teens under the age of 18 still drink, but we also know there are plenty of times when the law prevents it. But we also know that 16-year-olds can still legally have sex, join the armed forces, and in some parts of the UK get married and vote in some elections.

Save & Review

Only words saved from this story appear here.